![]() | ||||
| February 2012 | ||||
| Public Law Newsletter | ||||
| The three articles in this edition of the Hardwicke Public Law Newsletter look variously at implants, codes and answers. David Lawson and Leon Glenister explain the regulation of breast implants and the way in which medical devices from hip replacements to teeth fillings are approved for human use. Alex Campbell comments on the new School Admissions Code, and David Lawson considers some solutions from the Attorney General to the controversies of the Human Rights Act. | ||||
| What We Have Been Doing Recently . . . | ||||
| ||||
![]() | ||||
| Question Marks Over the Approval of Breast Implants | ||||
| By David Lawson and Leon Glennister | ||||
| The risks of untested and under-tested medicines are well known. The Thalidomide scandal saw 10,000 children born with disabilities, probably because the drug was not tested on pregnant women or animals. It was one of the early spurs to the reform of drugs regulation. More recently - in 2006 - six volunteers suffered organ failure when the first human clinical trials of TGN1412 showed that it caused a reaction in humans at much lower doses than in animals. This is an issue where the risk is not all one way - the early treatment of HIV saw a campaign by people infected with HIV who wished to hurry promising drugs through the approval process to general availability (where they have proved very successful). Read more . . . | ||||
![]() | ||||
| The Changing Face of School Admissions | ||||
| By Alexander Campbell | ||||
| Introduction “You shouldn’t have to hire a lawyer to navigate the school system.” With those words in May last year the Secretary of State for Education, the Rt Hon. Michael Gove MP, launched a consultation on a draft new School Admissions Code and a new School Admissions Appeal Code. Read more . . . | ||||
![]() | ||||
| What Rights? Enforced Where? Some Answers from the Attorney General | ||||
| By David Lawson | ||||
| Two easy answers are offered by those who object to a rights based approach to legal decision making – repeal the Human Rights Act and remove the right of individual petition to the European Court of Human Rights. Neither of those things will happen. Therefore much effort is being expended on finding more complicated ways to satisfy their concerns. Read more . . . | ||||
![]() | ||||
| This edition of the Public Law Newsletter was edited by Amelia Walker | ||||